Did the first strong signal, salary number or interviewer opinion become the reference point for everything that followed?
Open →Professional lens pack
Hiring & Interview Decision Lens Pack
A structured review for candidate screening, interviews, debriefs and final hiring decisions.
Use it when
Bring structure in before the conclusion hardens.
- screening CVs
- running interviews
- comparing finalists
- writing interview feedback
- making a hiring recommendation
Five lenses
Questions that challenge the decision, not the person.
After forming a first impression, did I mainly collect evidence that supported it?
Open →Am I overweighting one vivid answer, employer name or memorable mistake?
Open →Am I treating a past success as proof that the candidate's decision process was good?
Open →Would my rating be the same if I had written it before hearing the panel?
Open →Workflow
A short repeatable review.
Use with AI
Make the model a reviewer, not an authority.
Prompt: “Act as a hiring decision reviewer, not a recruiter. Separate observed evidence from interpretation, identify missing evidence, challenge the current favourite, and show where panel agreement may be hiding weak support.”
Keep the final decision, evidence standard and accountability with the human team.

