Reasoning Practice · Intermediate

A detailed plan with no outside view

A team has a detailed task plan for a data migration. It predicts 40 days, but nobody has checked how long similar migrations actually took.

Your decision

Which evidence should be added first?

  1. A

    More detail inside the current plan until every day is allocated.

  2. B

    A reference class of comparable completed migrations and their actual duration range.

  3. C

    A vote on whether 40 days feels optimistic or pessimistic.

Show the best first move

B. A reference class of comparable completed migrations and their actual duration range.

Why this move helps

More inside detail can improve execution planning without correcting the baseline. Reference-class forecasting tests the plan against completed cases.

Evidence still missing

  • Durations of comparable completed migrations.
  • Reasons this project differs from the reference class.
  • The distribution, not only the best or worst example.

Evidence note

Planning fallacy is a plausible lens when the estimate relies mainly on the inside plan. A poor reference class can also mislead, so comparability must be explained.

Next action

Set an outside-view range first, then document any evidence-based adjustment.

Best first lens

Planning Fallacy

Use the lens to ask a better question. It does not prove that a person or team has a cognitive bias.

Read the evidence review

Other defensible lenses

The situation may have more than one explanation.

Continue the path

Situation → skill → technique → action.

SituationProject estimation

Estimate time and effort with an outside view instead of relying only on the current plan.

Open situation →
SkillForecasting

You can produce forecasts that are easier to challenge, compare and learn from later.

Build this skill →
TechniqueReference-class forecasting

Use outcomes from comparable completed cases before refining an inside-view plan.

Run the technique →

All reasoning scenarios